Once, I was obsessed with the Queen of England. (Elizabeth II. You know, the one that’s alive.) Like, SO obsessed. I was eleven or twelve, and I spent a LOT of time in the biography section of my local library, checking out every book possible on the woman, watching documentaries, learning royal customs, wondering if our pedigrees cross at some point many generations back…(they don’t, by the way.) Did you know she has a major obsession with hats? Seriously, the woman has a hat for every outfit, and she has a billion outfits.
The thing is, when I was in the
throes of royal obsession, I did it quietly, by myself. Well, sometimes I’d
talk to my mom about it, so that she could be in on my life, but mostly, it was
me. And that was just fine. As an extremely private person, I felt like I could
feel an appropriate amount of ardor for a total stranger without uncomfortably
invading their privacy, or divulging any secrets of my own.
Maybe if I actually lived in
England, there’d be some other people to joy in the fandom of the Queen. But if
that were the case, I would probably find something else to obsess over.
The idea of Fandom in general is
really off putting to me. If I were in the shoes of one of these musicians, I’d
be thoroughly freaked out if people were constantly discussing me, everything
about me, everything I did, and so forth. Like I said: Extremely. Private. The
whole thing just makes me slightly uncomfortable.
Be that as it may, I can see how the
internet has effected the way people choose to geek out over their personal
idols – especially in the music industry. My father-in-law was a Deadhead, and
at the age of 70, he still wears T-shirts from his band following days.
The thing I found curious about this
new-age “relationship between fans and the people and things around whom they
organize” was how dependent a person’s success is on their fans.
“The flip side of fans’ increased power is a loss of control amongst those who’ve been able to control music production, distribution, and coverage….Getting control back is not an option. That’s just not going to happen. So the question is how you can build relationships with these fandoms that are mutually supportive. They do this best when bands and labels have to do their part to make that work.”
Can you
imagine if the livelihood of the Queen of England relied on whether or not
people liked her? Set aside that she’s a figurehead monarch who comes from old
money. Fine, bad analogy. Can you imagine if your own personal livelihood, your
success in your chosen career, relied on fans? Regardless if you are the most
passionate, amazing, ingenious artist on the face of this good green earth – if
you don’t have a good following, you’re toast.
Beetoven! He’s
a good example. The man was outright mean, they say. Just a grumpy pants, and
deaf to boot. But he was talented as all get out, and people respected him for
it. Even now, long after he’s gone, his music lives on. What if he’d had to
have a fandom based on his personal character rather than his actual talent? Isn’t
that exactly what fandoms are like now?
“Fans need to be seen as collaborators and equals.”
Really? I
don’t think they actually NEED to be seen as anything other than overly
obsessive. I understand that the internet, it’s so easy to connect over things
we love, and if we really love it we’ll support it. It’s super great, and helps
people get on in the world. But we also connect over things we don’t love. And
if something we don’t love is the attitude of the base player in such-n-such
band then that thing we don’t love so much? It’s toast.
Maybe I don’t
get it. I just see fans as invaders of personal space, and I have a very large
personal space bubble that I do not want invaded.
I guess I’ll
just have do my best to never become interesting. Or famous.
You obsessed over the Queen of England? Cool. I normally obsessed over Disney characters at a child.
ReplyDelete... I cannot imagine having my livelihood dependent upon how many "fans" I had. Talk about stress. I would probably be afraid to ever say or do anything. I pity the celebrities these days who are either overly adored or brutally attacked no matter what they do or say. I would hate that so bad. I'm with you--I'm resolved to never become interesting or famous on that level. But it's probably not something that is too difficult to avoid ...
Joking aside, the point seems to be how much the music industry is controlled by the masses, now more than ever before. YouTube is the magical famous-people generator. It makes me wonder how it was that people USED to get famous ... did they just play in their garage and people started inviting their friends to listen, and then it grew from there? How did they manage to ever get famous without the help of the internet? It must have bee difficult.
I watch a YouTuber who can be hilarious and thoughtful, and that's probably why he's got over two million subscribers. But a couple years ago, he posted a video expressing his concern over his viewers liking him. After that, for some reason, his views dropped, quickly. I don't think I've ever felt so sorry for someone I don't actually know. I scroll through his video comments and see complaints and praises, and I worry because, through the Internet, he can see these opinions about him. Dean's article said that people put their faith in the Internet, assuming everything they put up will be read/seen. But in this case, some commentators don't seem to realize they can't always pick and choose who will see their comments or what their reactions will be. The Internet is a dangerous, unpredictable place, people.
ReplyDeleteAh, and I'd forgot to mention, I really like your post. Well written, funny, and you make good points. That is all.
ReplyDelete